China party tent

• [PR]
  ×

  [PR]上記の広告は3ヶ月以上新規記事投稿のないブログに表示されています。新しい記事を書く事で広告が消えます。

  • 2025/04/23 03:22
• This-debatehas-been-raging-within
  It is legitimate to critique the wobbly -- and who can deny that it is not wobbly -- multi-party democratic order, but if it is to be a prelude for transforming India into a single-party democracy, then the alarm bells should be ringing across the country.It is Mr Shah’s democratic right to cast doubts about the efficacy of the multi-party democratic system in India. The Press Information Bureau, in its redoubt of the home minister’s speech, quoted him as saying: "But after nearly 70 years of Independence, there was a question in the minds of the people whether the vision of the founding fathers had been realised..According to BJP working president J. But the spokespersons’ take cannot be accepted without caveats. The problems and challenges posed by the existence of many parties jostling with each for power and influence are never in question.Mr Shah’s passing reference to the failure of the multi-party democracy in the country is accompanied by his eulogy, which is but natural, of the efficient decision-making of the Modi government of the past five years, and how the goal of a $5 trillion economy would ensure that every Indian would own a house, have a bank account, electricity at home and road connectivity by 2022.
  The opposite view that it is worth preserving India’s democracy and that economic progress would be achieved more efficiently through a democratic government than through the authoritarian rule of a single party.Addressing the National Management Convention of the All India Management Association earlier this week, Union home minister Amit Shah, while emphatically declaring that India will be a $5 trillion economy and praising the Narendra Modi government for its bold and decisive acts, raised doubts about the usefulness of a multi-party polity. It is true that there were many who had argued that India should have a two-party system on the lines of the Conservatives and Labour in Britain and the Republicans and Democrats in the United States.P.It is true that the theme of Mr Shah’s speech was not about the party system in India, and that it was about the virtues and achievements of the Modi government in the past five years, and therefore his comment on the issue of the perceived failure of the multi-party system cannot be treated as a considered view either of the Modi government or of the BJP. The more persuasive argument in favour of democracy has been that innovation in technology is possible in the conducive atmosphere of democracy, which is based on freedom of thought and expression. From 1952 to 1967, the Congress was the single dominant party in the country, but no one in the Congress had suggested that India should do away with multi-party democracy. It prevents the emergence of a dictator, however popular and democratic he may be. They would also say that there was no need for concern or apprehension about his passing remark on the issue of multi-party democracy. But it was a foregone conclusion that in a diverse polity like that of India, the Anglo-Saxon model of a two-party system would not work, at least not without considerable modifications.
  The implication is clear -- that the rule of the BJP is beneficial to the country, and that the existence of other parties would only be an impediment in making the country prosperous and the people secure and comfortable. He said that the debates of the Constituent Assembly showed that the founding fathers had hoped that a multi-party democracy would create a welfare state, but after 70 years it seems that the people have realised that multi-party democracy has not succeeded.It has also been a popular talking point whether Communist Party-ruled China’s successful emergence as an economic superpower was due to the fact that it did not have to contend with the irritations of a political opposition and that decisions for building the country could be taken and implemented without much ado, and that the stumbling block in India’s economic progress was its democracy. And it cannot be denied that he is raising questions about the keystone of a liberal democracy, which affirms the principle of a multi-party democracy. And Mr Nadda has disclosed that there are places where all voters Garden Gazebos Manufactures are also members of the BJP. If Mr Shah’s condemnation of the multi-party system and the BJP’s membership tsunami is juxtaposed, the dystopia of BJP-ruled India on the lines of the Communist Party-ruled China looms menacingly on the horizon.
  This debate has been raging within India, especially among the middle classes, and many a time the ultra-nationalists have argued that it is worth dumping democracy if Indians could be provided the basic amenities of life and India could be made a stronger country. Nadda, the latest membership drive has raised the figure of BJP members from 11 crores in 2014 to 18 crores in 2019.Political scientists and political philosophers from Plato’s time have always lamented the factionalism and internecine feuds in a democratic system, but the lived experience of democracies in Europe, America and parts of Asia and Africa has shown that a multi-party democratic system is a protection against the domination of a single party and a single leader. Whether the multi-party democratic system had failed to fulfil the aspirations of the citizens of the country?"The spokespersons of the government and of the party are sure to say that Mr Shah had made the remark in passing, and that his focus was more on the decision-making abilities of the Modi government compared to the Manmohan Singh government’s "policy paralysis". Nobel laurate and BJP’s bete noir Amartya Sen has always held that India’s achievements were better and superior to those of China’s because of India’s democracy.
  It cannot, however, be denied that Mr Shah himself seems to consider the multi-party democratic system in India to be ineffective and a failure. It is also the case that there are a large number of middle-class people who would concur with Mr Shah’s view. But it was found that it is the apparent anarchy of a multi-party democracy that guarantees the liberty of the people.
  PR
  • China party tent
  • 2020/10/27 11:40
  • 0
• The-crisisi-the-stateunit-was-brewing
  As always, it has chosen to cry hoarse and allege conspiracy after the camel was out of the tent. A sin, because it denotes lack of morality, absence of ideology, and worse, it denotes greed. In Gujarat, it could have easily averted the revolt. It is being paraded as strategic success by Amit Shah and as a sign of failure of the Congress. The crisis in the state unit was brewing for quite sometime. Widespread angst against the BJP is showing in various mass protests. As the political noose is tightening, the cracks are showing.The victory of Ahmed Patel in the Rajya Sabha poll seems more important for the party than winning the state. And it is no wrong, but realpolitik, to fish in the troubled waters for the Congress’ rival here. Then why all this. The Congress will continue to work on its public presence and its struggles against the BJP government. Over time, just as most other ethical behaviour and beliefs in politics have become non-issues, so has defection.
  The party has the option between surrendering to the Vaghela group which is more popular or losing the war.The case of about eight Congress state legislatures in Gujarat defecting from the Congress on the eve of Rajya Sabha elections, and just some months away from the Assembly elections is also being analysed similarly. BalashankarThe response of the Congress to the Gujarat crisis makes one wonder whether it is suffering from Lemming complex or Ostrich syndrome? The party is blaming the Bharatiya Janata Party, Prime Minister Narendra Modi and party president Amit Shah for the crisis, defections and the confinement of its MLAs in a luxury resort in Karnataka till the date of Rajya Sabha elections in the state on August 8. Could anyone believe that the MLAs are unsafe in their own states unless they are so unpopular with their electorate? The party is actually not protecting its men but curtailing their freedom so that they can be threatened and herd together on polling day to vote for Mr Patel. Clearly, the faction led by former Union minister and former state party chief Shankarsinh Vaghela and the traditional faction under Ahmed Patel and PCC chief Bharatsingh Solanki were at loggerheads. But like in Assam earlier and in Bihar (when Nitish Kumar met Congress vice-president before quitting Mahagathbandhan) the Congress leadership not only chose to ignore the warnings but blindly continued to support one faction against the other. Now that the communal cauldron post-2002, that it reaped to win thrice in Gujarat, and nationally in 2014, can no longer hide its underperformance in government, they are using strategies to malign a surging Congress, through devious tactics. 
  There are 22 dissidents supporting this faction, according to the insiders. Congress may be called guilty of not having the wherewithal to cajole and caution those defecting, but it can’t be blamed any further. The Congress, in spite of spending 20 years in the wilderness, is holding its own and launching a credible offensive against the BJP.Let’s look at the assumed impact of these defections in Gujarat — it puts a little doubt on whether Ahmad custom gazebo canopy Patel would be re-elected to the Rajya Sabha; it sends a signal to the voters in Gujarat, that the Congress is a divided house and the rats are leaving the sinking ship; it upsets a party in preparation for an upcoming Assembly election.The writer is Congress spokesperson. The difference between the BJP and the Congress votes was never a landslide; it was just some section of voters moving their allegiance. Blaming the BJP for its inner-party tussle will not impress the voters. The Congress is using both money and muscle power to coerce its MLAs into submission.Perhaps, what we could call a weakness in this case is the Congress’ inability to publicly manage opinion, by showing defectors and their reasons for what they are — opportunists, dishonest politicians who have been lured.
  It claims historical development, it claims a "Gujarat model", it claims extraordinary governance. And estimates say that the Congress will be spending a fortune for the transport and comfort of its MLAs for 10 days. By engineering defections, the BJP is hoping to weaken the Congress. He had even threatened to split the party alleging neglect a couple of times. Or else how does it explain the expensive sojourn of its MLAs in the holiday rendezvous at a time when Gujarat, especially the Congress strongholds were reeling under severe flood? In a state that is going to polls in a couple of months, the Congress MLAs have left their voters to fend for themselves in the heavy flood. Mr Vaghela had conveyed his displeasure to the party high command a number of times in the recent past. When the voter is defecting, a few legislators defecting will not make any difference. In recent times, it has been behaving as if it is out of sync in politics. Many factions already existed. The mood in Gujarat is changing, and so what do desperate manipulators and the political Mafioso do? They subvert the opposition, they buy off their opponents, they build smokescreen to escape, they disrupt and create chaos.To many like me, this shows desperation in the BJP ranks. The Congress could have avoided all these embarrassments had its leadership been more alert or sensitive to the sentiments of the state leaders.
  Over the last two-three years, news from Gujarat shows the BJP losing its popularity. Defections by elected persons, engineered by powerful interests, are now benevolently called  "political strategy".This was a crisis in the makingR. These are the first signs of a party sensing a slide. Equally determined is Mr Vaghela, his son Mahendra Sinh and his relative Balwantsinh Rajput, the rebel candidate who has queered the pitch for Mr Patel. In the public eye, just some years ago, defection was akin to a corrupt practice. The party has great experience in managing contradictions. Mr Modi, his consigliore Mr Shah, are doing just this. It is desperate to win the seat for Mr Patel, which has become an ego issue for the high command.A party that has deep roots in Gujarat, and has ruled the State for twenty years, should not need such tactics to ensure another win.This shows nervousness and desperation in the BJP. It deflects relevant issues to less crucial issues such as these defections — all in all an attempt to disrupt the emerging political situation in Gujarat. The writer is a member of the BJP Central Committee on Training, and Committee on Publications Desperate BJP trying to weaken usSandeep DikshitDefection, especially by legislatures, was once considered a "sin" in Indian politics.
  • China party tent
  • 2020/09/29 11:08
  • 0
• Virender-usedto-work
  He is being interrogated," SP, Palwal, Waseem Akram said.Palwal/Faridabad: A five-year-old girl was kidnapped, brutally raped and stabbed to death allegedly by a man who used to work at her father’s tent house in Asaoti village in Haryana’s Palwal district.. Virender used to work at the tent house owned by the girl’s father.
  The accused, identified as Virender alias Bholu, allegedly committed the heinous act on Thursday night over some old enmity with the girl’s father. It was only with the help of CCTV footages of the area that they could trace the girl’s body.In order to vent his anger, the accused abducted the girl and took her to his house. He then stabbed the girl in the stomach and stuffed her body inside a container to conceal the act."Virender was PARTY PUSTOM TENT(HC-D03) arrested and remanded to a three-day police custody on Saturday. They had a heated argument over some issue earlier.When the girl did not return to her house late in the night, the family members and villagers launched a search.
  • China party tent
  • 2020/09/15 10:52
  • 0